Off-Topic Discussions > Other Chat

Chit chat thread (May contain offensive content)

<< < (1306/1377) > >>

Miss Wednesday:

--- Quote from: Bing on February 15, 2012, 06:17:31 PM ---I don't fully understand why there is no fire/water pokemon.  Considering the move scald.  It would be perfect as a signature move for a pokemon like that.

--- End quote ---
What he said =w=

eddiedelta8:
i know i am a day late to say this but happy valentines day to you all

also my birthday was yesterday to i just read the message sent by (or automatically generated)
whoever



oh and i agree with bing  they have a fire/physcic why not make other pokemon like a fire/water or a grass/fire it seems like if ti involves adding one of the three types you get at the beginning with another it would never happen

but i think i know why they wont mix two types like that together
1. it would be hard to make a pokemon sprite of that and that would cause delays= more money they need to spend on it
2.they are running out of ideas as it is
3.the move pool would be confusing

(own comment on 3) i mean it would be like learning bubble or ember depending on what level it is(only a certain level until you cant learn it) like  INSERT NAME wants to learn bubble......1 level(s) later INSERT NAME wants to learn ember
you only got one shot to learn one or the other or something like that......or whatever.....i will post  again later my brother is asking me to make him a grilled cheese >.>

Hinagiku:
Another water/grass might be cool too. I love the water/fire mix, but the fire/grass.... Imma need more convincing than that particular one.

Jerry:
And... another picture I found. This time for Bing :P

Hinagiku:
So epic! ...Is that Cheren?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version