Entertainment > Other Games

Halo: Reach. Good or bad?

(1/8) > >>

Eulogy:
Well for of those who have Xbox Live, we probably all got the Beta Version. I thought it was amazing! I'm stoked for this game. Is anyone else?

Blaze:
Good. Beyond good.

Halo 3 was epic, Reach just gives me a nerdgasm everytime I think about it.

Silver:
It was good multiplayer. I certainly won't be playing MW2 for a while (garbage game).
I just hope its not as easy as Halo 3 or ODST in single player mode. I would lose all faith in Bungie.

Sam:
Good.

Halo's always had a better multiplayer than Call of Duty because it's fairer.

In Call of Duty, the higher level you are, the more choice of guns etc. you have.
In Halo, you begin every match with a rifle and if you want another gun you have to find them scattered over the map.

Call of Duty takes its gameplay way too seriously with all the "We lost this one" bull crap, at the end of the day it's a video game, Halo actually treats itself like a video game and not an actual shootout.

I much prefer hearing "Multikill, Killomanjaro" etc. than seeing a little pop-up in the corner saying:

"EpicNinja24672832, TRIPLE KILL."

I definitely don't give a f*ck if anyone else but me got a triple kill.

Halo > Call of Duty

Baka:
Hmm, I actually liked ODST more than Halo3. In anyway, got legendary edition waiting for me. :o

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page