Pokémon Discussion > General Chat
New Pokemon X & Y
Miss Wednesday:
I think it's fake, I can't imagine a water/fire Pokemon. ._. but we'll see C:
GrizzlyEatsKids:
I honestly thinks it's fake. Some of the names are far too similar to other pokemon, are a combination of multiple pokemon's names, or are just to uncreative.
Kamaran:
--- Quote from: Fenror on March 06, 2013, 10:33:18 PM ---I honestly thinks it's fake. Some of the names are far too similar to other pokemon, are a combination of multiple pokemon's names, or are just to uncreative.
--- End quote ---
I'm not gonna defend the 4chan post, but uncreative...? Hello Persian and Spheal? Maybe even Shield-on would like to join the party too.
The-Blades-slave:
Pidgey wants to come along!
GrizzlyEatsKids:
Oh, I know that some pokemon names are already far too simple, believe me. For example, take Cottonee. Some of the names here, though, are just as bad, if not worse, and there's a bunch of them. For example:
-Jacoq: Worst pokemon name I've ever seen. Also, take the name Jacob, rotate he "b", and viola. And what could the pokemon possibly look like, some random guy named Jacob?
-Dogsnout: No. Just no.
-Locast: Actually almost clever, but then again, they're just changing one vowel in a word. hen it's bug/dark, which doesn't make much sense. A bug/water is what would make the name clever (Locust + cast, as in to cast a fishing line).
-Whirlihog: While it seemingly makes sense, I just find it too close to Whirlipede. And I just don't see grass/flying, but it could work.
-Lagoom: Another example of changing 1 letter.
-All of the Shamroc line: Very simple, 2nd and 3rd forms only change 1 letter from original word, and Iwish contains no creativity whatsoever.
There's more, but I think you get the point.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version