Pokémon Discussion > General Chat
New Pokemon X & Y
nightshade06:
Maybe everyone is wrong and there is no second? And the reason they didn't reveal the type is because they was too dumb or drunk to put it in yet? It could just be they are trying to drag this out on something they have ran out of ideas on. lol
Pokemaster MAC:
--- Quote from: Pokemaster MAC on March 10, 2013, 12:47:14 PM ---
--- Quote from: Miss Wednesday on March 06, 2013, 09:38:09 PM ---I think it's fake, I can't imagine a water/fire Pokemon. ._. but we'll see C:
--- End quote ---
I had a bit of a revelation thinking of the rumor of them incorporating Sound/ Light types: Xerneas looks like a Light/Grass type, while Yveltal might be Sound/Flying so I imagine there's a 4-way cycle of weaknesses here
Light>Sound>Flying>Grass (Imagine as a circle);
Light is faster than Sound
Soundwaves knock Flying types down
Flying already beats Grass
Grass/plants absorb light.
On another note...
This is kinda what I had in mind for a Flaracuda Water/Fire pokemon or it's pre-evolved form. It's based off of the idea of a barracuda and the fact there's underwater volcanoes. I imagine some Pokes would live near/ around these areas, so yeah :p
--- End quote ---
Look again, there's nothing to the effect of me saying Grass beats Flying type, Fenror. And i take it offensively you are calling me a troll, where you obvious don't know how to argue properly. You keep saying over and over that you think, and that you assume that Sylveon is a normal type, and yet when i present new information on my points you feel the need to not prove anything more and call me a troll, without purposely saying it to my face.
You also claim that I'm basing this 'THEORY', (go ahead and go back and read, as you kept telling me to) solely on Sylveon and it's supposed type. When you look back, you'll indeed see that I'm basing off of the revealed Legendaries, and what types they could possibly be. Your only true argument is that because previous Normal type pokemon are pink, you assume (and is apparently obvious) that Sylveon is Normal.
And that link to Bulbapedia you posted for Milotic, there's nothing on the page showing Milotic or it's colors. And I'm comparing the 2 pokemon because they have 'like' color schemes.
GrizzlyEatsKids:
Ok, calm down. I said the wrong thing about the type advantages. I saw someone say something similar somewhere else, and I got it confused with this.
And argue properly? There is no right or wrong way to argue, and I do assume that these things are true based off of already concrete facts and evidence, and until anything is officially announced, we can't truthfully say we know what is going on. Also, you mentioned the legendaries once, and then focused mainly on Sylveon, so that is what I used as a basis to debate. Speaking of Sylveon, I gave more than one reason why I believe that it may indeed be a normal type, certainly not just based on color, and yes, as I've stated, to me is does seem rather obvious that Sylveon would be a normal type.
And I'm not sure what's with the bulbapedia link. I just checked it and you're right, it didn't work, but I copied the url and even tested it before posting it here.
This was meant to be more of a friendly debate than some heated argument, and you need not to get so angry. I was merely providing my honest viewpoints on the entire matter, and if you don't like debating, then you didn't have to keep responding to the points I made.
Desbear:
NOW CALM DOWN WILL YOU? Everything is goin to be fine. Remember people, WE ARE PURELY MAKING/DISCUSSING THEORIES.
GrizzlyEatsKids:
Speaking of which, I still particularly like the one you posted earlier this week, Meowth. It is one of my more favorite theories aabout the new Eeveelutions that I've seen so far.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version