Pokémon Discussion > General Chat

New Pokemon X & Y

<< < (54/83) > >>

Roloc:
I don't see where dragons have ever been that bad. I didn't see the need for them to add another weakness to them. For the most part all you needed was a fast pokemon(or scarf) that could use a dragon or ice type attack. Even then those two attacks weren't needed that badly. Now back in the old days of gen 1, psychic types were pure monsters, their only weakness was ghost/bug types and the only ghost in the game was part poison which is weak to psychic and good bugs back then were pretty much non existant and the only bug that got a decent bug attack was part poison which made it weak to psychic. Now THEY needed another weakness, thus the reason dark types were added.

Miss Wednesday:
Here ya go Meowth, Fire/Normal xD

GrizzlyEatsKids:
So far, I'm actually pretty pleased with all of these new pokemon designs. I think I like them more than Gen V, honestly. Hopefully this trend stays.

Miss Wednesday:

--- Quote from: Fenror on June 13, 2013, 03:41:51 AM ---So far, I'm actually pretty pleased with all of these new pokemon designs. I think I like them more than Gen V, honestly. Hopefully this trend stays.

--- End quote ---
I like a lot of the new ones, but this one is kinda dumb...
It's a Fairy type xD
http://www.serebii.net/corocoro6135.jpg

GrizzlyEatsKids:
Yeah, don't care for that one too much. Being mostly mono-fighting on PO now, I'm really looking forward to seeing Pancham and its (hopefully) evolutionary line. Pandas are my favorite animals as well, so I really like that one. Fennekin better not turn into Fire/Fighting. We have enough starters that do that already.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version