Pokémon Discussion > General Chat
Pokemon you HATE.
Chad29:
Pokemon like Picharisu and Plusle/Minun. If you're going to make a pokemon with no evolutions, don't make them so weak. Dunsparce is in this group too.
Too many of a certain type of pokemon. Do we really need three different normal type versions of a cat? Persian was fine, and Delcatty is ok if you think of it like a pampered housecat as opposed to a feral cat like Persian. But Purugly? Why? This also includes too many of a certain type. Of course this goes along with my believe that we have way too many pokemon in total. Coming out with new pokemon each generation is all well and good, but does it have to be 100+ each time?
From a strategic standpoint you have some pokemon like Camerupt. Low defenses and health do not go well with low speed, especially when your signature move loses power when you lose health.
As a final off topic note, I'm posting in this old thread because a Mod locked a recent best or worst thread and linked to this one, telling the OP to use the search function. It seems odd for a Mod to do this for such an old thread, but whatever.
St. Jimmy:
I think some of the worst looking, pointless, and most forgetful pokemon came from johto,
Qliwfish; it's just ugly...
dunsparce;The land snake pokemon... And it apparently has wings and a stinger???
Unown; It is useless all it learns hidden power...
mantine; i forgot it existed!
And i could probably think of more if i felt like it...
Chad29:
I think Mantine is fine. It actually learns a flying type attack, unlike Gyarados, and is a good special sponge.
Unknown was created to be the pokemon version of a secret code, even though most of the letters they take the shape of are easily identifiable.
6Deth6klok6:
There is only one pokemon that i think is useless that is Magikarp, in lower level that is.
Passive:
No Pokemon should be hated!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version