* User Info

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Recent Posts

2023 Check in by Gawerty
[March 28, 2023, 12:41:12 AM]


Holy crap my login worked. by Ez
[December 03, 2020, 08:56:26 AM]


Been a while. by Bing
[July 13, 2019, 04:47:06 AM]


Was Feeling Nostalgic (Pokemon Knights) by Monzta
[October 24, 2018, 07:37:00 AM]


Old Habits Die Hard by Miss Wednesday
[January 23, 2018, 12:35:35 AM]


WHY IS EVERYONE MISSING by Tickles
[September 16, 2017, 08:20:25 PM]


Been a long time. by Monzta
[August 27, 2017, 03:18:58 PM]


Pokemon Universe Tribute Thread by Jerry
[September 29, 2016, 06:41:31 PM]


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - deadae

Pages: 1 ... 38 39 [40] 41
586
General Chat / Re: 17 trainers
« on: October 08, 2010, 04:45:13 PM »
i need some willing trainers here.... see y does everyon wanna win all the time in reality there is always someone who can beat u. i mean even naruto loses... it don't mean they are better than u cuz u lose it could have been circumstantial(hopefully i spelled that right lol) these one type theme teams are very important to me and i thank yall for posting your different teams but we seriously need to start getting a hold of those who actually want to join right now i have only two others... im allowing ur teams to not be completly on type...  our water trainers whole team wont be water but its ok cuz his team still revolves around the water element  so something like that is cool as well... we really need trainers there can be more than 17 but there is no one leader ....there will be 17 leaders and nothing is descided without a vote.... also im not saying this has to be ur only team eigther just when u rep us this is the team u use. well message me or post if ur interested or have questions

587
General Chat / Re: 17 trainers
« on: October 08, 2010, 04:35:45 PM »

You had me going until there.

are u the one who said a team of one type will fail in the end... naw i disagree and i hear a lotta ppl say that so thats what this organization will be for to prove ppl like you wrong! but anyway im tired of using multi type teams its too easy... this is basically an experiment for me i wanna see what these different teams will do and it also helps ppl choose non popular pokemon alil more too. plus all types do to me in my mixed teams is tell me what the foe is weak against. even though i use teams my pokemon are usually individual fighters... basically each one of my individual pokemon on my true teams  are built to strike first and destroy anyone and thing in one hit but if they are hit its ok cuz i make sure they can survive one hit from a super strong pokemon with a super strong move if they can't then they arent on my team....i strike first hit hard and survive powerful blows thats y im confident

588
General Chat / Re: 17 trainers
« on: October 08, 2010, 04:24:04 PM »
omg i so dislike poison types (thats y im using them) i haven't researched the different moves they all can learn yet so without that knowledge here is what i have in mind 4 now

its down to these ten

crobat
nidoking
venusaur
toxicroak
drapion
gengar(must have)
tentacruel(must have)
pendorra
muk
skuntank

so after i see available moves then i'll re post

589
General Chat / Re: 17 trainers
« on: October 07, 2010, 06:30:01 PM »
i need to form a group where each individual will only use one type of pokemon ...if you were in my group what would your type and team be?

Poison Type
Nidoking
Crobat
Magmar
Tentacruel
Gengar
Venusaur
hmm... magmar aint poison .....hmm...uh-oh

590
General Chat / Re: 17 trainers
« on: October 07, 2010, 06:21:52 PM »
Oops, Chaos, Gengar is Ghost/Poison ;)
yeah thats y i said it was a nice twist lol

591
General Chat / Re: 17 trainers
« on: October 07, 2010, 06:00:13 PM »
Hmm, hard choose, but mine is:

All Dark Type:
Kirakizin
Sazandra
Spiritomb
Tyranitar
Gengar
Absol

gengar huh?... theres a twist me personally i don't like darks but i know i'd have to have a houndoom somewhere on that team and i could do without absol and i'd also have sneasle...(i have history with my lil sneezy)**blush**

592
General Chat / Re: 17 trainers
« on: October 07, 2010, 05:54:10 PM »
Mine is ground, as I've always said...

Gliscor
Hippowdon
Flygon
Garchomp
Torterra
Swampert
actually this team is very nice and grounds my fave type as well

593
General Chat / Re: The Ultimate Debate!
« on: October 07, 2010, 05:45:46 PM »
ononokus is soooooo cool but his speacil defense is to low for me if ur gonna be weak against ice

kurimugan is too slow for me but he is nice... i don't like how it looks tho.

dragonite is excellent because he learns agillity if u can just survive any one attack do agillity then i think ull be able to handle anything he is pretty good i think...he looks like a huge baby tho...

and of course garchomp is nice----hes amazing like flygon but better

salamances stats are nice but me personaly have never seen him stand up against an icy wind...and thats pretty bad....

hmm if i had to pic a dragon before the fourth gen i'd say flygon all the way
but everysince then there has been garchomp he is super amazing just like flygon but better
lol almost everyone picked garchomp i just now saw that

594
General Chat / Re: The Ultimate Debate!
« on: October 07, 2010, 05:44:12 PM »
ononokus is soooooo cool but his speacil defense is to low for me if ur gonna be weak against ice

kurimugan is too slow for me but he is nice... i don't like how it looks tho.

dragonite is excellent because he learns agillity if u can just survive any one attack do agillity then i think ull be able to handle anything he is pretty good i think...he looks like a huge baby tho...

and of course garchomp is nice----hes amazing like flygon but better

salamances stats are nice but me personaly have never seen him stand up against an icy wind...and thats pretty bad....

hmm if i had to pic a dragon before the fourth gen i'd say flygon all the way
but everysince then there has been garchomp he is super amazing just like flygon but better

595
General Chat / Re: which pokemon is better
« on: October 07, 2010, 05:19:52 PM »
I find snorlax better because the highish defenses help the fact that it has really high HP.

since when did snorlax get a high defense?

596
In-Forum Games / Re: Count to 10 000
« on: October 05, 2010, 09:05:22 PM »
yo!

597
General Chat / Re: The weakest pokemon
« on: October 05, 2010, 08:54:31 PM »
Caterpie learns Bug Bite ::) Somewhere in the level 20s
ooh i forgot about abra.. and fyi im 3rd gen down and very some 4th bug bite didn't exist

598
General Chat / Re: The ultimate battle
« on: October 05, 2010, 08:51:26 PM »
bug is not effective on ghost, so, it's not super effective and Sableye doesn't receive a single damage.
yeah it used to be super effective but i just looked it up its not anymore hmm... oh well what do i care the second on still works and i don't personally use furry cutter regardless

599
General Chat / Re: Who is better Mew or Arceus (or another)?
« on: October 05, 2010, 08:45:23 PM »
isn't arceus that pokemon where u choose his types...thats awesome uhmmm but mew can learn every move... i know nothing about arcius or whatever but mew has a huge problem ...his stats they are like right above average which means regular pokemon will beat him if he has the wrong moves so i'll give it to arceus

600
General Chat / Re: The ultimate battle
« on: October 05, 2010, 08:41:03 PM »
use any fast pokemon that can take two hits and has furycutter
or uses a fighter/fire blaziken or infernape
holla

Pages: 1 ... 38 39 [40] 41