Pokemon Universe MMORPG

Pokémon Universe => Trainers Lounge => Topic started by: Millzar The Pirate on March 31, 2010, 04:16:34 AM

Title: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Millzar The Pirate on March 31, 2010, 04:16:34 AM
why are why not?
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Amphi on March 31, 2010, 04:31:01 AM
well personally it depends on my mood i usually do just because its kind of the natural progression of the game but occasionally I'll leave the pokemon at the stage its at just because I like it
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Phosphorous on March 31, 2010, 04:37:40 AM
Usually if i let them stay at a pre evolution it's because I'm trying to get them to learn a move they can't learn later, or they might learn it sooner.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Millzar The Pirate on March 31, 2010, 04:51:38 AM
sometimes if the pokemon is going to learn allo the moves anyway i might just keep it if i think the pre evolution form is cooler
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: NostawDNA on March 31, 2010, 06:10:54 AM
I usually just let it evolve unless I need it to stay in a pre-evolved state to learn a move, but even then if i can use a TM later on I'll just let them evolve if they are ready
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: boyben10 on March 31, 2010, 07:12:49 AM
On Heartgold, i delayed my gastly's evolution so it could learn shadow ball earlier, but then i decided not to evolve it, and now its level 46 and helped me get past lance's gyarados a lot easier.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Wrathes on March 31, 2010, 07:18:58 AM
That's nice. ^^ Make sure you get Gengar as soon as possible and have Tbolt in your Move Pool besides Shadow Ball. ^^
As for me, I tend to stay for a move that would be learned earlier or a move that will not be learned. Then breed that move to the egg and then continue on with the correct Nature. If it was something like first start, I'll just plow through and let them evolve. :p
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: The Fireball Kid on March 31, 2010, 07:37:56 AM
I thought if you evolve your pokemon, you gain more stat points. Guess I'm wrong?
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Wrathes on March 31, 2010, 07:51:25 AM
You are right. The EV's you gain are increased by a bit.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Stranger on March 31, 2010, 05:56:02 PM
I thought if you evolve your pokemon, you gain more stat points. Guess I'm wrong?

Yup... which in some cases I think is plain wrong... f.e. I think a Squirtle is faster than a Blastoise. Still, the stats tells me otherwise... can't imagine that lump of a pokemon move fast when out of water.

On topic though I always let my pokemon evolve. Yes... except Squirtle... because he's cute... which is quite a bit of an unmanly thing to say. But yeah... screw you...everyone. ;D
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: The Fireball Kid on March 31, 2010, 06:02:03 PM
I thought if you evolve your pokemon, you gain more stat points. Guess I'm wrong?

Yup... which in some cases I think is plain wrong... f.e. I think a Squirtle is faster than a Blastoise. Still, the stats tells me otherwise... can't imagine that lump of a pokemon move fast when out of water.

On topic though I always let my pokemon evolve. Yes... except Squirtle... because he's cute... which is quite a bit of an unmanly thing to say. But yeah... screw you...everyone. ;D

Only pokemon I would consider not to evolve is Balbasaur. His evolutions look really ugly. But he would be so weak compared to a venasaur if they both level 100 I think.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Declan_23 on March 31, 2010, 06:44:58 PM
I always evolve all my pokemon except Pikachu. How could you evolve it after seeing how much it doesn't want to in the anime?
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Grey on March 31, 2010, 11:04:30 PM
I tend to not evolve my starter Pokemon but have no problem evolving my other Pokemon. It all depends on the moves they need to learn and to be honest, how cool the form looks.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: baralai15 on March 31, 2010, 11:24:04 PM
it depends on if its higher level it learns a better move. like scyther learns a move at like level 20 something but you can evolve him whenever pretty much. If it doesnt learn anything it cant learn when its evolved then i would like to evolve it if that makes any sense.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: stephenkill2 on March 31, 2010, 11:29:56 PM
I will never evolve my scyther, he is level 100 and a scyther, because scissor is gaytarded.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Shiranui on March 31, 2010, 11:32:40 PM
Uhhh, Depends on the pokemon actually, and what attribute you're focusing on. For example, if you want a pokemon with high attack. You have a pokemon that focuses on defense in it's basic stage but attack in it's evolved stage. But unless it's that, I let all my pokemon evolve.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Jerry on April 01, 2010, 10:27:58 AM
You are right. The EV's you gain are increased by a bit.

Nope, EVs gained are not increased, they are constants. Only the base stats of the pokemon are incease, and even here, it's not always the case.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: sym on April 04, 2010, 01:36:21 PM
i allways evolve starters and most other pokemon because they have better stats but if the pokemon evolves into something ugly like nosepass to probopass  ahhh!
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: shadowblade-E2 on April 11, 2010, 04:13:11 AM
i always evolve my treecko and mudkip cause there evolves are cool and powerful others it depends 8)
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Silver on April 11, 2010, 05:54:35 AM
Pokemon have better growth rates after they evolve, and I'll just go to a move tutor if I REALLY need a move badly enough.
Also they (usually) look cooler after they evolve.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: marcopolonian on April 11, 2010, 05:39:15 PM
I usually let the pokemon I raise evolve (except for that one Glameow sitting in my box with an Everstone). I'm the type of person who really can't understand doesn't really care about IV/EV, and rather go with the pokemon I choose because of their looks because they seem cool.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Cinnabar on April 21, 2010, 05:19:08 AM
I usually wait for them to learn certain moves to breed a stronger one and then let my newly bred Pokemon evolve.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Raikt on April 21, 2010, 05:43:11 AM
In new games; yes, I will let them evolve. Simply to see what new Pokemon they evolve into. However, once I'm familiar with the game, the Pokemon, and the use of them competitively, then some times I don't. Mareep, for example. I refuse to evolve it because, honestly, I don't like Flaafy or Ampharos as much as I do Mareep.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: SwIzZy on April 21, 2010, 06:16:08 AM
I make my pokemon evolve unless I need to keep them in a pre evolved form to evolve or to evolve them into a different evolved form.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Sazhuy on April 21, 2010, 01:16:48 PM
It depends on which pokemon it is like my starter i didn't evolve until level 25
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Millzar The Pirate on April 26, 2010, 09:02:15 PM
i always keep my charmander a charmander till like level 80 then i evolve it to charmeleon to charizard! mostly because thats how i did it in the original games because the back of charmeleons head always looked funny and i didnt want to look at it for long! that way i only have to look at charmeleon for one level. plus charazard is so freakin awesome. oh and i never evolve my evee because i likes it the wAY it iz
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: vitsch on April 26, 2010, 09:24:30 PM
I make my pokemon evolve unless I need to keep them in a pre evolved form to evolve or to evolve them into a different evolved form.

same here
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: SnowWolfAlpha on April 27, 2010, 01:45:20 AM
Of course nowadays quite a few pokemon don't learn certain attackes until they evolve, e.g. if you don't evolve Cranidos into Rampados, you'll miss learning half it's attacks.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Bugz on April 27, 2010, 03:25:20 AM
I don't let any of my starters evolve because they look the best before evolving.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Dark Knuckles on May 02, 2010, 03:10:42 PM
I do even my starters to get stronger.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: babyHERO on May 02, 2010, 05:17:23 PM
I let all of my pokemons evolve bcuz i dont like to keep them back from thier full potential.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Killer2k9 on May 28, 2010, 06:01:32 PM
I don't always because you can only see that pokemon once (if it's a starter :'() but i usually would  :D
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Jerry on May 28, 2010, 06:53:51 PM
But now that you can breed, you can see them million times ::) Just saying.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Dvys on May 28, 2010, 07:40:10 PM
I always let them evolve :)
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Millzar The Pirate on May 28, 2010, 07:57:45 PM
growlithe is one of the few i always evolve because he is legendary
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: neokills on May 28, 2010, 08:20:51 PM
most of the time I do, but there are some cases that i will not evolve them, but if i do that then i make sure i catch and extra to evolve just so i have them all :)
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Neon55 on June 05, 2010, 03:29:46 AM
Sometimes I will, sometimes I won't. It all depends on if I like the Pokemon in it's current state or not.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: grenadier2 on June 05, 2010, 07:04:56 AM
the only time i dont let them evolve is when they learn a move they wouldnt learn.
for example i think at lvl 42 or somethin, mudkip learns hydro pump, but neither marshtomp or swampert learns it
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: psyelemental04 on June 05, 2010, 09:03:39 AM
most of the time, yea
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: TheChosenOne on June 05, 2010, 06:47:12 PM
I usually let my pokemon evolve whenever they're supposed to.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: ChibiVampire on June 06, 2010, 08:33:37 AM
I don't hold them back. I usually do if they don't learn any new moves when they evolve... >.>!
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Roloc on June 11, 2010, 07:53:11 AM
All my favorite Pokemon are at their final evolution anyway so, yes.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: ChibiVampire on June 11, 2010, 07:57:02 AM
What about Ninjask...
I see its not Shedinja... =3=
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Roloc on June 11, 2010, 08:08:56 AM
Technically you get shedinja at the same time as ninjask so you could say that they are both the final evolution of nincada
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Hiteryan on June 11, 2010, 03:33:04 PM
I tend to like the 2nd form appearance of most Pokémon that have 3 stages. Like Bayleef, Haunter, these two are the only ones I'm thinking of right now cause I'm lazy, and I usually don't evolve them until like lvl. 50-60.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: ChibiVampire on June 11, 2010, 03:36:17 PM
Technically you get shedinja at the same time as ninjask so you could say that they are both the final evolution of nincada
Darn it! You got me there... >.>!
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Jerry on June 11, 2010, 07:14:56 PM
I tend to like the 2nd form appearance of most Pokémon that have 3 stages. Like Bayleef, Haunter, these two are the only ones I'm thinking of right now cause I'm lazy, and I usually don't evolve them until like lvl. 50-60.

Me do too! Some pokemon just sometimes get a drop in appearance appeal when they get to their last evolution...
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Adiatma on June 18, 2010, 10:30:28 AM
Yes, of course. as soon as possible.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: ketchum, ash on June 18, 2010, 08:55:36 PM
i dont let my pikachu evolve because i want my pikachu to be as strong as ashes lol :P
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Runeheart on June 18, 2010, 10:35:28 PM
Yes and no for me, I try to get at least one of every pokemon.
Thus meaning a Squirtle, Wartortle and a Blastoise ect.
So I do evolve to the highest but also keep the first form
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: boyben10 on June 19, 2010, 01:11:34 PM
I usually evolve my pokemon, except when they learn a good move (such as shadow ball, on my HeartGold gastly) and sometimes, i decide i like them a lot in the form they were in while i was training them for the move that I just give them an everstone to hold so they stop trying to evolve and I leave them that way, even though they are weak in their baby forms, even though sometimes baby pokemon can work out fine, such as a combination of the moves Hypnosis, belly drum, wake up slap, and waterfall on a Lv. 53 poliwag I have on my Japanese soulsilver game.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: shadowbattlex on June 21, 2010, 06:31:34 AM
not always, sometimes i give them a stone that keeps them in their current state. ex: if i get a treko i will get it to evolve to grovile but then stop there because i dont like its 3rd form.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: ninja neb on June 28, 2010, 10:22:24 AM
It depends on the pokemon with me. If one of my favourites is a basic form or stage 2 form, then i only let them evolve to the form i like, or not at all.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Oboko Luckstone on June 28, 2010, 10:46:54 PM
It depends on the Pokemon itself. Like my Magby, for example. I think that little guy's just too adorable to change. Same thing with my Eevee. Not only are they adorable, they both hold a special meaning to me. Altering their form kind of changes the meaning behind them for me.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: TheGr8 on June 29, 2010, 11:23:04 PM
Mine usually depends on if the pokemon will learn a certain move quicker as everyone else said or it will depend if I like the EVO better than the first form pokemon. IE: Growlithe --> Arcanine simply because Arcanine is my favorite pokemon. Although you need a stone, its still a choice of the matter to evolve it or not. I actually wait till Growlithe is around lvl 50 to evolve into Arcanine.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: sliux109 on June 30, 2010, 12:37:06 AM
i do it always exceppt for:

i dont know the time and i try to evolve to umbreon but i get espeon
evolve to shedninja sometimes because even though it has wonderguard, it has only 1 hp
i want to wait so that is can get a certain move earlier
i know that soon the new generation will come out with a different evolution and i wait for it and trade to that game and evolve there
im going to trade pokemon and prev evolution's base happiness is higher than nest evolvution
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Ver-go-a-go-go on June 30, 2010, 04:19:48 AM
Sometimes it's just strategic to not evolve right away, which is common knowledge. Back when I had Fire Red, I stopped a Snorunt from evolving in Glalie once just because Snorunt would learn Blizzard the very next level, while it would take Glalie a good deal more.

Then there's just the cuteness factor of those 1st stage evolutionary lines. Togepi for instance; I just can't stand to let that little guy evolve. I always slapped an Ever Stone on it first time I got so that when happiness finally got to that point, it just wouldn't evolve. Same thing with most of the baby Pokemon too. Pikachu is the same way, even though Raichu is much better. Guess I just got to used to not being able to evolve him in Yellow, so now I can't bear to evolve it anyway. Thank god for the Light Ball though; makes having a Pikachu soooooo much better.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: TheGr8 on July 01, 2010, 04:12:11 AM
Sometimes it's just strategic to not evolve right away, which is common knowledge. Back when I had Fire Red, I stopped a Snorunt from evolving in Glalie once just because Snorunt would learn Blizzard the very next level, while it would take Glalie a good deal more.

Then there's just the cuteness factor of those 1st stage evolutionary lines. Togepi for instance; I just can't stand to let that little guy evolve. I always slapped an Ever Stone on it first time I got so that when happiness finally got to that point, it just wouldn't evolve. Same thing with most of the baby Pokemon too. Pikachu is the same way, even though Raichu is much better. Guess I just got to used to not being able to evolve him in Yellow, so now I can't bear to evolve it anyway. Thank god for the Light Ball though; makes having a Pikachu soooooo much better.

It is all in preference and what the trainer wants to do. I did the same thing with my Snorunt too lol :)
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Monzta on July 07, 2010, 03:56:19 PM
I let it evolve if the pokemon that it's going to evolve into looks awesome.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: LeoReborn on July 07, 2010, 04:10:42 PM
I tend to like the 2nd form appearance of most Pokémon that have 3 stages. Like Bayleef, Haunter, these two are the only ones I'm thinking of right now cause I'm lazy, and I usually don't evolve them until like lvl. 50-60.

Me do too! Some pokemon just sometimes get a drop in appearance appeal when they get to their last evolution...


Best example of that is Mudkip. (How convinent....)
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Frenchfry on July 07, 2010, 05:44:38 PM
I never evolved Grovyle in ruby version, because Sceptile just looks gross, and everyone knows that Grovyle is a long-legged mac-daddy. I also sorely regret letting turtwig evolve at all in Pearl. Torterra is like someone took venasuar and turned him into a tree. it looks less flowery and more tree-like. Normally this is a good thing, but not when dealing with venasuar. I later turned my starter into an HM slave because he looked, as Stephenkill would say, 'gaytarded'.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Jerry on July 07, 2010, 07:24:32 PM
I tend to like the 2nd form appearance of most Pokémon that have 3 stages. Like Bayleef, Haunter, these two are the only ones I'm thinking of right now cause I'm lazy, and I usually don't evolve them until like lvl. 50-60.
Me do too! Some pokemon just sometimes get a drop in appearance appeal when they get to their last evolution...



Best example of that is Mudkip. (How convinent....)

Nah, you missed my point. Marshtomp it the one I'm talking about. In the case you're wondering, my fav is Marshtomp, not Mudkip. I have this avy until I have an idea for an animated Marshtomp... If I could make it do the move Hydro Pump it would be nice!
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Frenchfry on July 07, 2010, 07:40:07 PM
I tend to like the 2nd form appearance of most Pokémon that have 3 stages. Like Bayleef, Haunter, these two are the only ones I'm thinking of right now cause I'm lazy, and I usually don't evolve them until like lvl. 50-60.
Me do too! Some pokemon just sometimes get a drop in appearance appeal when they get to their last evolution...



Best example of that is Mudkip. (How convinent....)

Nah, you missed my point. Marshtomp it the one I'm talking about. In the case you're wondering, my fav is Marshtomp, not Mudkip. I have this avy until I have an idea for an animated Marshtomp... If I could make it do the move Hydro Pump it would be nice!
Funny you say that, because I actually hated marshtop. When I heard that every1 lieks mudkipz, I decided to try a playthrough in ruby with him as my starter. In a fantastic Blond moment, I got lost in rout whatever, just above oldale city. I spend about two hours there grinding while looking for a way to the next town, and my mudkipz evolves. I was all like, "eeeeewwww....", which is when I proceeded to find the path to the next town. I hated my starter pokemon until he evolved again, which is when I decided to nickname him, because his name wasn't manly enough for that level of awesomeness.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: LeoReborn on July 07, 2010, 08:27:30 PM
I tend to like the 2nd form appearance of most Pokémon that have 3 stages. Like Bayleef, Haunter, these two are the only ones I'm thinking of right now cause I'm lazy, and I usually don't evolve them until like lvl. 50-60.
Me do too! Some pokemon just sometimes get a drop in appearance appeal when they get to their last evolution...



Best example of that is Mudkip. (How convinent....)

Nah, you missed my point. Marshtomp it the one I'm talking about. In the case you're wondering, my fav is Marshtomp, not Mudkip. I have this avy until I have an idea for an animated Marshtomp... If I could make it do the move Hydro Pump it would be nice!
Funny you say that, because I actually hated marshtop. When I heard that every1 lieks mudkipz, I decided to try a playthrough in ruby with him as my starter. In a fantastic Blond moment, I got lost in rout whatever, just above oldale city. I spend about two hours there grinding while looking for a way to the next town, and my mudkipz evolves. I was all like, "eeeeewwww....", which is when I proceeded to find the path to the next town. I hated my starter pokemon until he evolved again, which is when I decided to nickname him, because his name wasn't manly enough for that level of awesomeness.

When I was Talking About Mudkips, they Start of Cute, and get less and less so as they evolve. I said, "How convenient" because everybody on here Lieks Mudkips so much. (Especially Kamaran and Hitey.)
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: DanyTbb on July 29, 2010, 10:10:13 PM
I let it evolve...becauz much stronnger..>.> n looks better
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: valmaremoslayer on July 30, 2010, 01:03:26 AM
I usually let them evolve, but if they stop learning moves then I will wait.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Passive on July 30, 2010, 02:52:49 AM
Eevee is too cute to evolve!
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Frenchfry on July 30, 2010, 06:33:42 AM
Eevee is too cute to evolve!
Well, if it's cute you're going for, stick with mudkipz, plusle-minun, pichu, and phione.
-wait.. Phione isn't a legendary, right? Because... there's a bunch of them, and they have lame-o stats
(http://pokemondb.net/images/artwork/phione.png) Hate it. I dare you. I double dare you. Hate that face, and I will kill you.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: valmaremoslayer on July 30, 2010, 09:51:55 PM
Eevee is too cute to evolve!
Well, if it's cute you're going for, stick with mudkipz, plusle-minun, pichu, and phione.
-wait.. Phione isn't a legendary, right? Because... there's a bunch of them, and they have lame-o stats
(http://pokemondb.net/images/artwork/phione.png) Hate it. I dare you. I double dare you. Hate that face, and I will kill you.

Well because Eevee is awesome and you usually only get one a game! (It's my favorite too and it's evolutions)
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Chad29 on July 31, 2010, 01:07:22 AM
Back when I was stingier with my TMs I would wait for certain pokemon to evolve. However I've found it easier to just let them evolve and use TMs on my main pokemon.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Hova on July 31, 2010, 03:42:30 AM
I let it evolve...becauz much stronnger..>.> n looks better

Same here thy're a lot cooler when they evolve.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Frenchfry on July 31, 2010, 04:19:20 AM
I let it evolve...becauz much stronnger..>.> n looks better

Same here thy're a lot cooler when they evolve.
...Marshtop.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Monzta on July 31, 2010, 04:40:21 AM
I let it evolve...becauz much stronnger..>.> n looks better

Same here thy're a lot cooler when they evolve.
...Marshtop.
...Sceptile.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Frenchfry on July 31, 2010, 04:16:53 PM
I let it evolve...becauz much stronnger..>.> n looks better

Same here thy're a lot cooler when they evolve.
...Marshtop.
...Sceptile.
That too.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Twisted Sword on August 10, 2010, 10:27:46 AM
Always. They look cooler when they evolve and they're stronger. Everyone always says "If you make them evolve later, they'll be even stronger." Screw them. I don't have the freaking patience.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: ghostman50 on August 10, 2010, 12:54:21 PM
why are [sic] why not?

Why not.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Sora on August 10, 2010, 09:02:58 PM
Like most of you, I wait for a certain move, than evolve them.
The only pokemon I never evolve is my Vulpix.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: baralai15 on August 11, 2010, 01:08:13 AM
Well depends on what moves it can learn on the pre-evolution. For growlithe for example, he can learn moves that arcanine cant so therefore you keep him unevolved until you learn them. but usually i evolve unless the move is a must have.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Frenchfry on August 11, 2010, 03:02:54 AM
You know who I never let evolve? Magicarp.
"Magicarp, that splash attack is all up in your grill! Hit him with a splash attack!"
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: UnationConsideration on August 11, 2010, 03:20:32 AM
No, im a christain and dont want my pokemon to evolve Screw evolution! (Jk :p)
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Frenchfry on August 11, 2010, 04:28:06 AM
No, im a christain and dont want my pokemon to evolve Screw evolution! (Jk :p)
I like how you put jk at the end of THIS, because people might take it the wrong way, but you don't when you say that you have cocaine on your nose.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: UnationConsideration on August 11, 2010, 04:30:12 AM
*Looks down all sad* I guess we all learnd a lesson today right pikachu?
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: PkMn Trainer Black on August 27, 2010, 12:32:50 AM
I always evolve my pokemon except on two conditions:


1. I'm Making an evolution set


2. I let my Pikachu keep the Light Ball.

Enough said.....
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: theunkn0wns on August 27, 2010, 02:33:55 AM
Usually if i let them stay at a pre evolution it's because I'm trying to get them to learn a move they can't learn later, or they might learn it sooner.

Yep. Thats the only reason i would hold them back from evolving, I always want the last evolution even if the Pre-evolution looked better.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Steel on August 29, 2010, 12:22:50 AM
I don't evolve them on the level they evolve. I usually evolve the starter at around level 20-25. Otherwise, I evolve them at around 10 levels after when they actually are meant to evolve, unless they're happiness-based evolutions like Crobat or Umbreon, then I just let them evolve.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: xhizor8201 on August 29, 2010, 08:14:02 AM
I check the internet for a pokemon's moves. Like what i did for murkrow, it learns different moves then when it does when its honchkrow. So i decide what move(s) i currently want, and then i evolve them if their next evolution stage cannot learn it.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Frenchfry on August 29, 2010, 08:22:19 AM
You guys are so obnoxiously practical with your pokemon that I'm just plain disturbed. You realize that I NEVER evolve pichu? It's just too damn cute to be replaced by some dirty pikachu.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: UnationConsideration on August 29, 2010, 03:14:03 PM
You guys are so obnoxiously practical with your pokemon that I'm just plain disturbed. You realize that I NEVER evolve pichu? It's just too damn cute to be replaced by some dirty pikachu.
If you EVAR use a pichu in competitive battiling...I assure you Pichu will be 1HITKO.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Chad29 on August 29, 2010, 04:35:18 PM
It's a strategy game, Frenchfry. We're supposed to be practical. That's why I don't care for people that say pokemon X is bad because it looks ugly in their opinion. Who cares about looks outside of contests? The important thing is stats, abilities, and movepools.

I once started training an Azurill for a cute contest because I would rather the pokemon winning the contest to actually be cute. However I think Barboach is much easier to win a cute contest, even though I don't think it's very cute. In contests I can understand. In regular battles there's no reason to bash a pokemon like Scizor just because you think Scyther looks better.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Frenchfry on August 29, 2010, 06:30:45 PM
It's a strategy game, Frenchfry. We're supposed to be practical.
But it was also designed so that six year olds would be able to beat it with little effort. I could understand if Pokemon was, like... ANY kind of challenge at all to beat, but c'mon. I beat the game before I could even READ!
If you EVAR use a pichu in competitive battiling...I assure you Pichu will be 1HITKO.
I've solo'd the elite four with a pichu. beating just one player-controlled pokemon isn't that hard, either.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Chad29 on August 29, 2010, 06:46:52 PM
I'll bet you weren't at the same level as those elite four when you beat them. Besides, fighting NPCs is very different than fighting players. We players actually fight intelligently. Not to mention that in competitive play we aren't allowed to use hyper potions and full heals during battle. You can not beat a dragon type team of equal leveled pokemon with a pichu without using potions. Probably even with using potions.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Frenchfry on August 29, 2010, 07:09:36 PM
Ahem...
(http://img165.imageshack.us/img165/5305/1204223692289dg9.th.jpg) (http://img165.imageshack.us/i/1204223692289dg9.jpg/)
You're no different from them.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Chad29 on August 29, 2010, 07:22:32 PM
I don't deny that. I also noticed your lack of counterpoint to my last post.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Frenchfry on August 29, 2010, 08:15:53 PM
Thats because there's no reasoning with a tournyfag. Hence why there are still no stages allowed in Brawl tournies besides Final Destination. Trying to argue the fun into you would be like trying to convince ghostman that you can lose a game in pokemon without automatically sucking afterwards. I could go on and on and on, and you would just start building up some weird pokemon teir list, and I don't want that.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Silver on August 29, 2010, 08:26:21 PM
Ahem...
(http://img165.imageshack.us/img165/5305/1204223692289dg9.th.jpg) (http://img165.imageshack.us/i/1204223692289dg9.jpg/)
You're no different from them.

I think the one on the left is me.
I understand why they don't accept other stages other than final destination though. Its so that you don't die from the chance of the in-stage hazards. It would totally suck to pay to enter a real brawl tourney and have a victory taken away from you because you got pegged by a car in Onett or accidentaly hit a randomly falling bomb block in green greens. But I do wonder why they don't accept something like, battlefield or temple. You know, the ones where there are no hazards.

Never really made sense to me
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Jerry on August 29, 2010, 08:35:55 PM
That's also why I sometimes choose some restrictions in PvP battle, like lightweight, or make a deal with a friend about using pokemon which can be obtained by egg only or pre-evolution pokemons (Pichu, Magby, Elekid, Budew, Azurill, etc).

They didn't introduce the restrictions without any idea of how it will be used!

(Don't talk tourneys with me, there aren't any here in Mauritius :()
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Sam on August 29, 2010, 11:08:21 PM
You guys are so obnoxiously practical with your pokemon that I'm just plain disturbed. You realize that I NEVER evolve pichu? It's just too damn cute to be replaced by some dirty pikachu.


You're right!

Before Johto when I was only a wee nipper, I was all like:
"Yeah, Pikachu's cool... but it needs to be smaller and cuter and have pentagon ears."

Johto came out and I was like: "WOOOOHOOOO!"
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: PkMn Trainer Black on September 02, 2010, 12:51:16 AM

I think the one on the left is me.
I understand why they don't accept other stages other than final destination though. Its so that you don't die from the chance of the in-stage hazards. It would totally suck to pay to enter a real brawl tourney and have a victory taken away from you because you got pegged by a car in Onett or accidentaly hit a randomly falling bomb block in green greens. But I do wonder why they don't accept something like, battlefield or temple. You know, the ones where there are no hazards.

Never really made sense to me


I'm not sure, but probably because on battlefield, you can break the platform so you can get back on stage, which is like an in-game remedy. The possible reasonfor temple is because of the area under the ruins. There you can create percentages greater than sudden death with ease. Those are two possible reasons i can think of.


And sorry with just leaving the quote on my other post. My dog clicked the button.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: UnationConsideration on September 02, 2010, 12:54:01 AM
Black...all you did was double post quote somthing two times...
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Jerry on September 02, 2010, 08:26:59 AM
The second one has his reply, but he failed to put it outside the quote tags.

If you want to change your post, PkMn Trainer in Black, you can use the 'Edit' button.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: pikapower7 on September 22, 2010, 05:26:50 AM
Usually if i let them stay at a pre evolution it's because I'm trying to get them to learn a move they can't learn later, or they might learn it sooner.


Yeah, I do that too
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: deadae on October 15, 2010, 04:53:18 PM
non of my pokemon evolve at the right lvl because i concentrate on speed so in other words my gyarados may be slightly weaker in otherstat but he will be very fast  if i hold magikarp until lvl40 he is only slightly faster if u keep magikarp until lvl 30
and charmeleon gets more speacial than charizard does so i hold him until lvl 45-55 depends on upcomeing tourneys.... i sacrifice other stats just for one or two stats to me its well worth it.... thats also how i know those stats on those sites yall are looking up arent as accurate as u think they are for one if u look up lvl 100 stats for a fully evolved pokemon those stats are unrealistic because thats acting asif that pokemon grew up from lvl1 and up as in always a charizard never a charmeleon never a charmander...

also i love to catch pre evolved pokemon in the game to because those are treated as pokemon that were raised from lvl1 even they still wont have the max stats tho cuz trained ones are stronger than wild ones  like in red blu yellow i like to capture the pidgeotto thats in or right before the virridian forest it will always wind up stronger than ones that evolved from a pidgey who provides nothing but a henderence  to pidgeots growth...

i hope yall understand what im saying...i suk at explaining...but all my studies came from me wanting to know and then trying things out i didn't know about all those websites so i learned for myself by myself
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: stephenkill2 on October 15, 2010, 06:36:43 PM
I always evolve my pokemon of course! Then I get more money when I sell them to the meat processing factory! Especially if they have the ability thick fat!
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: deadae on October 16, 2010, 04:51:27 PM
I always evolve my pokemon of course! Then I get more money when I sell them to the meat processing factory! Especially if they have the ability thick fat!
grrr....
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Millzar The Pirate on November 02, 2010, 03:51:07 AM
wow this got kinda off topic
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Amphi on November 02, 2010, 05:01:32 AM
nope i like some pokemon's preevos more so i leave them be :)
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: vedsace on November 03, 2010, 10:20:51 PM
lets see uh carmander chicorita piplup
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: stikman on November 03, 2010, 10:38:59 PM
i always let the pokemon evolve the first time around, but after that, i normally go back and see what happens if they don't evolve. like Amphi said, some pre's are either better, cooler or both.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: rajlev on December 27, 2010, 03:47:56 AM
i never liked to let my vigorot evolve, because slaking is to lazzy....
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: MyTh on December 27, 2010, 10:08:01 AM
I have always let my pokemon evolve.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Mr. Fox on December 28, 2010, 12:10:21 AM
I can tell, based on your sig... 8)
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: MyTh on December 28, 2010, 12:12:03 AM
I'm ironic like that.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: augiux on January 14, 2011, 04:42:44 PM
i let my pokemon evolve like normal and never use stones
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: zylonnick on January 14, 2011, 08:57:10 PM
I let my pokémon evolve if they can normally. If they need an evolution stone, I choose the one who is the best balanced between coolness and strength. The 'like-factor' counts for 2/3th
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: eddiedelta8 on January 15, 2011, 06:17:27 AM
i dont let my starter pokemon evolve until like a really high level but any other pokemon besides pikachu i let evolve evolutionary stone or not
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Azaeliaz on January 17, 2011, 08:54:45 PM
All my friends evolve their Pokemon. I tend not to do that. Take Shinx for example. It learns Thunder Fang WAAAAAY earlier than Luxio or Luxray do. I speak from xperience.

I also think that evolving your Pokemon may be odd if you don't know what types it'll evolve into. Like, a Grotle (only grass type) evolves into Torterra (grass-ground type). That makes the effectiveness of Ice-type moves 4x instead of 2x.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: PkMn Trainer Black on January 18, 2011, 12:33:48 AM
though that's true(turtwig is my first starter overall), the only pokemon you have to worry about are Gyarados, Ice routes, gym, lucian's Medicham, and Cynthia's Milotic. not only that, that combo type takes away electric moves, and makes poision regular
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: moodyangel on January 24, 2011, 07:51:55 PM
I always let mine evolve because I get excited and can't hardly wait to see what the evolution looks like!  Plus I need bigger Pokemons so I can kick the gym leaders down to the ground!
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Greenthumb on January 24, 2011, 08:54:41 PM
Yes usually.  It just means I have a stronger force to fight with!
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Yazan on January 27, 2011, 08:55:44 PM
Time not , sometimes yes  ::)  ::)  :D whats the pokemon wants  ;D
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Sterling on January 30, 2011, 07:32:01 AM
I always evolve mine because 1. It's exciting and 2. I see it as a "natural" pokemon process.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Juno on January 31, 2011, 01:59:39 AM
Before I beat the Elites I evolve them but after that when I start to train for battling buddies I hold off on it because it is faster for training purposes.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: AceValentino on February 02, 2011, 04:54:19 AM
Hmm... Depends. THe pokemons that I spend a great deal of time and training on, I don't evolve until later. But the others that I have a lesser interest in than yeah i do.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Frenchfry on February 02, 2011, 06:41:50 AM
Does anybody really LIKE ludicolo? I mean, I don't know its stats, but that thing is pretty damn ugly.
In fact, from that evolution chain, I'd take Lotad. But I don't really like them, in particular.

Also, this seemed pretty pointless of a post for post number 666.
Derp.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: eddiedelta8 on February 11, 2011, 02:49:49 AM
no i wouldnt let them evolve.
well not until they learn some good moves
then i evolve them
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: NexosYourGayBestFriend96 on February 23, 2011, 11:21:15 PM
The only reason i would not let my pokemon evolve is because either im trying to teach it a powerful move early, or just because that pokemon just happend to be one of my favorites.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Chad29 on February 26, 2011, 06:33:02 AM
I like Ludicolo, Frenchfry. I actually like how he looks as well.

I don't know if I've said this, but if the pokemon I'm training learns the same moves regardless of evolution, I'll go ahead and let it evolve. If I have good TMs, I'll give it those so it isn't held back by weak moves.

If it learns moves at one stage that it doesn't learn at another, I'll act accordingly.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Mr. Fox on February 26, 2011, 12:52:17 PM
for me, if i don't let my pokemon evolve i feel like i am hurting them. :'(
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Lumillis on February 26, 2011, 02:02:15 PM
I never let Dragonair evolve, i just dont like the look of dragonite compaired to Dragonair.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: OptimusRex on May 28, 2011, 05:27:59 AM
I usually let them evolve, except once on accident I forgot I gave my tailow an everstone, and he didn't evolve when it was supposed to.  I thought it was a glitch and the guidebook I got was wrong.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Annafu on May 30, 2011, 06:02:56 PM
I never let Dragonair evolve, i just dont like the look of dragonite compaired to Dragonair.

THIS.
This is the only non evolution I do. I let everyone else evolve whenever. I will sometimes delay evolution if I need a pre evolution move, but otherwise I'm too lazy to keep preventing it.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Wire on May 30, 2011, 07:30:57 PM
Too lazy its just pressing the b button man your lazy if you cant do that.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Crazy Prophet on May 31, 2011, 12:43:50 AM
I usually let pokemon evolve, for the simple reason of making them stronger. However, sometimes it is best to prevent evolution, in the case of the Evolution Stone in b/w (yes, capitals are needed to distinguish it from evolutionary stones). A boost in defense and sp defense by 50% is very handy for a number of pre-evolutions, sometimes making them more powerful defensively than their fully-evolved counterparts. Chansey, rhydon and porygon-2 are some of these. In rhydon's case, while not carrying as much attacking power as rhyperior, the Evolution Stone and sanstorm support DOUBLES its special defense (and increases that crazy physical defense stat to 150%)
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: velejo on May 31, 2011, 01:18:08 AM
i do it for the stat bost as as well the feeling of achivement. 

EX: i m angaed to strencghten a pokemon with crappy starter attacks and have  made it into an unstoppable Pwning machine.

THW WORLD IS MINE BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Annafu on May 31, 2011, 08:13:02 AM
Too lazy its just pressing the b button man your lazy if you cant do that.
Yes. I am that lazy. And I also find it annoying to have to press the B button every level. I understand that its important for it to try and evolve with every level, but I'm just a lazy snorlax. xD
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Frenchfry on May 31, 2011, 08:49:03 PM
You could give it an everstone, but then you'd be out a held item.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: eddiedelta8 on June 01, 2011, 12:58:16 AM
the only Pokemon i actually wouldn't evolve is pikachu because it learns volt tackle
i wouldn't evolve the others though i just don't like evolving Pokemon it makes me feel like they are leaving me...
i don't care about stats so it wouldn't matter to me if i had a high defense Pokemon a Pokemon is a Pokemon...
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Fantom on June 01, 2011, 01:35:50 AM
the only Pokemon i actually wouldn't evolve is pikachu because it learns volt tackle
i wouldn't evolve the others though i just don't like evolving Pokemon it makes me feel like they are leaving me...
i don't care about stats so it wouldn't matter to me if i had a high defense Pokemon a Pokemon is a Pokemon...

So basically u wouldn't evolve any Pokemons.

As for me I only evolve a pokemon that i like. The others I dont evolve them cuz they are going into the PC soon.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Desbear on June 01, 2011, 01:37:31 AM
i agree the only time i evolve is when i like the pokemon
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Quote on June 01, 2011, 04:18:28 AM
It truly depends on the pokemon, but for the most part yes.

I'd rather have a Garados then a Magikarp
I'd rather have a Charizard then a Charmander
and I'd rather have a Cloyster then a Shellder

However, I'd rather have a Pikachu then a Raichu (like most people)
and I'd rather have a Skitty then a Delcatty
Eevees are debatable, as I love every form of Eevee, including Eevee him/herself.


Then again the only pokemon I normally don't evolve are the ones that I remember as a Child wanting to sit on my shoulder as I strut down the sidewalk into a forest readying myself for my first badge.

So yes I do evolve 95% of my pokemon.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Annafu on June 01, 2011, 07:10:36 AM
You could give it an everstone, but then you'd be out a held item.
I would do everstone, but I use held items a lot. :/ Especially when farming berries for moves like petal dance and stuff.
I really only ever use everstones for breeding. x:
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Jerry on June 01, 2011, 06:38:37 PM
the only Pokemon i actually wouldn't evolve is pikachu because it learns volt tackle
i wouldn't evolve the others though i just don't like evolving Pokemon it makes me feel like they are leaving me...
i don't care about stats so it wouldn't matter to me if i had a high defense Pokemon a Pokemon is a Pokemon...

Actually... Pichu learns Volt Tackle through breeding and Pikachu just inherits it from the evolved Pichu, and so would a Raichu upon evolution, just saying :)
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: codker on June 01, 2011, 06:43:56 PM
I have always let my pokemon evolve apart from once on emerald when I stopped my treeko evolving so it could learn bullet seed.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Wire on June 01, 2011, 09:20:19 PM
Yes.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: kristy on June 03, 2011, 08:15:33 AM
I always let my pokemon evolve until or unless, I didn't learn the next movement to gain more points. But i don't always evolve my favorite started pokemon's
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: PkMn Trainer Black on June 03, 2011, 08:18:46 AM
I have always let my pokemon evolve apart from once on emerald when I stopped my treeko evolving so it could learn bullet seed.

I thought it could only learn it through breeding and TM.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Trainerc on June 03, 2011, 06:05:40 PM
Every trainer has there own way of training i for one will never evolve a pikachu but i would allow my pokemon to evolve naturally, just because its evolving early doesnt make it, annoying its just how the game was set but its all up to us were the trainers, we all have a different training style.
 ::)
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: eddiedelta8 on June 03, 2011, 08:03:40 PM
the only Pokemon i actually wouldn't evolve is pikachu because it learns volt tackle
i wouldn't evolve the others though i just don't like evolving Pokemon it makes me feel like they are leaving me...
i don't care about stats so it wouldn't matter to me if i had a high defense Pokemon a Pokemon is a Pokemon...

So basically u wouldn't evolve any Pokemons.

As for me I only evolve a pokemon that i like. The others I dont evolve them cuz they are going into the PC soon.


no not truely my answer i evolve maybe like 10% of my pokemon like how my mareep is faster than most pokemon above its level....even though the speed might stay i say it looks kinda cute with its sheep face  :P
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: kesl on June 22, 2011, 03:15:23 PM
Out off all the pokemon game I always let my pokemon evolve. I may change that for this game.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Wire on June 22, 2011, 04:09:08 PM
Yes
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: deadae on July 02, 2011, 11:26:21 PM
i don't evolve scyther because i train flying types and i wouldnt evolve magmar until he has a speed of 320 or higher same with polywhirl
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: SparkleJoy on July 03, 2011, 12:16:54 AM
No, not always because sometimes I don't like the evolved pokemon or because sometimes they are unable to learn moves through level up once they evolve.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Flynt on July 03, 2011, 10:04:13 AM
i evolve most of my pokemon but i evolve pikachu after lv 50.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Wrathes on July 03, 2011, 07:05:26 PM
No, not always because sometimes I don't like the evolved pokemon or because sometimes they are unable to learn moves through level up once they evolve.
There are exceptions of moves for certain pokemon.. =/
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: BlazingNinetails on July 18, 2011, 11:31:54 PM
Eevee
Because Eevee has like 7 evolution u can pick
and Vulpix only if i feel like it cause i like Vulpix better even though he/she i make evolve into ninetales
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Azaeliaz on July 26, 2011, 06:51:28 PM
Some Pokemon I do, some I don't. When I'm playing my Platinum (which I know is ANCIENT now), I usually deter their evolution for a few levels or so to see if they learn any moves. Besides, there are some Pokemon that can only learn moves in their pre-evolved form. I remember I was playing a new game and I didn't let any of my Pokemon evolve until I started going up against Maylene and Crasher Wake.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Shadow of Darkness on July 26, 2011, 08:34:48 PM
I usually try to evolve pokemon as fast as possible unless I want them to learn a move.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: iluvlucario on July 29, 2011, 07:34:57 PM
It Depends if I want to use them in contests or not and sometimes if the pre evolved pokemon has a better variety of moves.     ;D   ;D     ;D
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Noah_Road on July 29, 2011, 11:15:02 PM
I generally evolve my pokes as soon as possible. If I need a pre-evo move then I'll either look it up before hand and hold off the evolution of simply use the move relearner. The only pokemon I will not evolve now is Chansey because I can give her an evolite and she automatically becomes better than Blissey in just about every way :P
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Mr. Fox on August 01, 2011, 10:54:22 PM
Dang! you sound like me. if i don't know it, i will after a week thanks to google (or what ever search engine you use). but yes i always evolve my pokes, unless they can effectively use evolite. like lileep over cradily.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Noah_Road on August 01, 2011, 11:25:01 PM
It makes me laugh that people don't evolve their pokemon so they can give it an evolite. Fun fact: Not EVERY pokemon can effectivelly use the evolite. People have tried putting evolite on Combusken, Haunter, and Wartortle. Only pokemon that either have a higher usable stat, better typing (this is in Dragonair's case), or is named Chansey should not use evolite.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Bing on August 01, 2011, 11:32:51 PM
It works well with Sealeo
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Mr. Fox on August 01, 2011, 11:33:34 PM
yeah i laugh at that stuff... like really.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Bing on August 02, 2011, 12:09:39 AM
It makes me laugh that people don't evolve their pokemon so they can give it an evolite. Fun fact: Not EVERY pokemon can effectivelly use the evolite. People have tried putting evolite on Combusken, Haunter, and Wartortle. Only pokemon that either have a higher usable stat, better typing (this is in Dragonair's case), or is named Chansey should not use evolite.


But why not sealeo works well with it.  Though it needs to be paired with aqua ring and it's ability ice body (during a hail storm)

Sealeo @ Evolite
Bold
Ice body

Aqua ring
Brine
Toxic
Protect

Evs
132 HP
124 Def
252 Sp Def


 It works very well in a hail team.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Noah_Road on August 02, 2011, 12:51:30 AM
Anything with Ice Body and Aqua Ring will work well in hail. Sealeo still isn't bulker than Walrien though, even with evolite. If each of Sealeo's base stats were about 10 points higher, than it would be viable like Chansey, Shellgon, or Gligar (in LC). The fact that Sealeo's only way of damaging the opponent is through consistent hail stall also makes Sealeo seriously outclassed by its evolved form.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Bing on August 02, 2011, 03:16:01 AM
Ehhh I should probably mention that my hail team is a borderline team.  I'm not sure if his evolved form is borderline.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Mr. Fox on August 02, 2011, 03:20:29 AM
no, i think its ou.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: TheSolx on November 14, 2011, 01:27:51 PM
The most interesting Trainer in the world:
"I don't always evolve my Pokemon, but when I do, they become stronger!"
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Hinagiku on November 15, 2011, 06:05:40 AM
I almost always let them evolve, often for my Pokedex, but also because the stats are higher. Even if I don't like an evolution at first, I usually learn to love it (such is my case with Walrein and Wailord).
I use my Eevees' personalities to decide their evolution, in those specific cases. The only Pokemon I don't really ever evolve is Dragonair, because I don't care for Dragonite all that much. If I get a second Dragonair, I might choose to have it evolve. But not the one I actually use in battles.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Bing on November 15, 2011, 08:02:39 AM
For this whole topic, it honestly depends... On if they can only learn a move I want in an earlier stage.  If not I always evolve them.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Yume Tsuki on November 15, 2011, 10:22:57 AM
Most pokémon need evolution in order to get stronger stats, however there are some  that not neccesarily get stronger by simply evolving like scyther or pikachu, or another few. As for scyther and Pikachu it's mainly the speed diffrence.

Usually I let them evolve for the sake of being strong enough to beat the game. However, there were times where I had a Charmander around level 83 because I liked him that way. But theres no way you can keep a caterpie the way it is and keep it viable to fight with just Tackle and Stringshot. Unless you go for the batonpass method to support it.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Shadowfred on November 15, 2011, 02:32:40 PM
I don't know where you're getting your information from, but Pikachu has terrible stats compared to Raichu. He goes from 300 total base stats to 475 total. But yeah, pokemon like Scyther don't need to evolve to keep up. With pokemon who evolve with stones, you might want to make sure you have all the moves you want, as most of them don't learn any more by level up.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Jerry on November 15, 2011, 08:41:59 PM
Indeed, only thing that Pikachu has more than Raichu is possible Sp.Atk obtained from the Light Ball, but then... Pikachu is more of a physical pokemon...
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Burning Roses on November 16, 2011, 12:21:01 AM
i sorry to tell you this jerry hun, it double atk and Sp atk.

http://www.smogon.com/dp/items/light_ball
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Jerry on November 17, 2011, 08:22:11 PM
Yes, if you look at the previous versions, it raised its sp. atk only:

http://veekun.com/dex/items/misc/light%20ball

I never bothered to check it again after DPPt because I didn't play HGSS or BW with lightball.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: deadae on November 21, 2011, 01:29:36 AM
sry but as someone who loves raichu and hates pikachu .... pikachu is much better
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: TheSolx on November 22, 2011, 04:15:50 PM
How can you hate Raichu? :'(

In my personal opinion, my "fan-view of Pikachu were ruined after a few seasons with a guy with the weird hat and the weird voice that obviously can't age. (Yes, I'm talking about Ash)
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: deadae on November 22, 2011, 05:11:55 PM
How can you hate Raichu? :'(

In my personal opinion, my "fan-view of Pikachu were ruined after a few seasons with a guy with the weird hat and the weird voice that obviously can't age. (Yes, I'm talking about Ash)
i never said i hate raichu i said i hate pikachu but in game he is much better
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: TheSolx on November 22, 2011, 05:21:42 PM
How can you hate Raichu? :'(

In my personal opinion, my "fan-view of Pikachu were ruined after a few seasons with a guy with the weird hat and the weird voice that obviously can't age. (Yes, I'm talking about Ash)
i never said i hate raichu i said i hate pikachu but in game he is much better

Just me misreading  :-\
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: deadae on November 22, 2011, 05:51:46 PM
Its kool i shoulda over looked it anyway, just angry sry.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: PkMn Trainer Black on November 30, 2011, 11:46:21 PM
You might as well evolve Pika into Rai, since the light ball won't go to BW
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: TheSolx on December 01, 2011, 12:05:48 PM
I don't always evolve my Magikarps... but when I do, I do it wrong

(http://th07.deviantart.net/fs15/300W/f/2007/071/a/9/flygon___gyarados___suiryugon_by_slifertheskydragon.jpg)
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: kesl on December 02, 2011, 04:57:04 PM
I always allow my pokemon to evolve.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Wire on December 02, 2011, 08:41:49 PM
Yes.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Mr.Dodo on December 04, 2011, 08:14:14 PM
With those Pokemon which evolve with evolution stone I don´t evolve em till the last attack they get.
But all others I evolve immedatly but with exceptions (like kabuto, archen...)
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Dkiddeh on December 05, 2011, 01:43:31 PM
Yep i will always let them evolve, because it's one step closer to completing the pokedex! And that's my goal aventually.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: TheSolx on December 08, 2011, 10:52:33 AM
With those Pokemon which evolve with evolution stone I don´t evolve em till the last attack they get.
But all others I evolve immedatly but with exceptions (like kabuto, archen...)

(http://ragecomics.memebase.com/wp-content/themes/vip/cheezcommon2/ragecomic/packs/scared/images/Gasp.png)

Not- Not- Not even Nidoking?!
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Aquashin on December 08, 2011, 01:26:03 PM
i do but i preffer using pokemon that dont evolve, in most of my games i use Pachiritsu that kicks ass in the Def and Sp.Def department
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Wire on December 17, 2011, 12:03:27 PM
Yes.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Condro on December 27, 2011, 10:14:32 AM
I usually push back evolution in most pokemon just incase I am missing moves but in some cases where it takes extra to evolve em I just say screw it. for example I always grab a kadabra for my psychic always been a fan of his its a pain trading him to evolve and I have become partial to him since I have used him since way back in red/blue
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: FireDarkGuy on December 27, 2011, 10:32:39 AM
I let my Pokemon evolve only after he knows all the strong moves available for him before evolve.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: IndigoChamp on December 30, 2011, 02:25:43 AM
I always let my pokemon evolve, the stat boost is worth more than the new moves (which you will eventually get anyway)
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: shermana on December 30, 2011, 03:36:31 AM
I always let my pokemon evolve. The only time i don't is when it will learn a great move that it won't be able to learn after evolutuion
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Mercula on December 30, 2011, 05:18:12 AM
I always let my pokemon evolve. The only time i don't is when it will learn a great move that it won't be able to learn after evolutuion
So you don't always let them evolve
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Mercula on December 30, 2011, 05:21:15 AM
No because in a lot of the games heart scales are hard to come buy so specific moves that can only be leanrn't by not evolving the pokemon to a specific lvl may not be learnable because of lack of heart scales.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Curtoa on December 30, 2011, 07:34:58 AM
I almost never stop my Pokemon from evolving. I will never forget the faces of my friends when I sent out my level 100 Magikarp.
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Shadow of Darkness on December 30, 2011, 09:15:21 PM
So i guess Magikarp was your almost never one..?
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: Curtoa on January 01, 2012, 04:55:50 AM
yup  ;D
Title: Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
Post by: NexosYourGayBestFriend96 on January 01, 2012, 05:11:35 AM
I pretty much evolve all my pokemon... except Shuppet. Banette is creepy.