User Info
Recent Posts
2023 Check in by Gawerty
[March 28, 2023, 12:41:12 AM]
Holy crap my login worked. by Ez
[December 03, 2020, 08:56:26 AM]
Been a while. by Bing
[July 13, 2019, 04:47:06 AM]
Was Feeling Nostalgic (Pokemon Knights) by Monzta
[October 24, 2018, 07:37:00 AM]
Old Habits Die Hard by Miss Wednesday
[January 23, 2018, 12:35:35 AM]
WHY IS EVERYONE MISSING by Tickles
[September 16, 2017, 08:20:25 PM]
Been a long time. by Monzta
[August 27, 2017, 03:18:58 PM]
Pokemon Universe Tribute Thread by Jerry
[September 29, 2016, 06:41:31 PM]
|
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - ghostman50
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 19
31
« on: August 10, 2010, 04:21:24 AM »
Who is your least/most favorite person on the PU team?
Who is your least/most favorite member of PU?
32
« on: August 10, 2010, 04:11:43 AM »
Not sure what the big fuss is about. The PU team has already made it clear that any profits will go to server costs, not into their pockets. So, any potential payable option will be (*gasp* an option) at the descretion of the purchaser. Think about it, it will be nearly impossible to keep up with server costs and other costs that go into the game with thousands of 12 years olds or broke college students with no means of income, that has absolutely no intention of donating of their own free will.
It would be ideal to think that every member of Pokemon Universe (16k+) would find 5 freaking dollars to donate to the project, but that's never going to happen...
so if the PU team decides to sell a few things or make a few extra features available to those that are actually contributing (monetarily) to keep the game going, why not just accept it? It's nothing to cry over.
As stated before, there is a balance team... so there wont be stats boosting to make mi metapod an Uber.
And though the game is free for everyone, it's stupid naive to think that the PU team will continue to use their own money to finance this game through it's entirety. It may just have to come down to offering incentives to earn that extra month... and as said before, the game's free, afterall.
Im all for an item mall. It'll add another layer of depth as well.
33
« on: August 09, 2010, 07:24:08 AM »
Breaking News:
You're welcome to making your own 3D pokemon MMO whenever you wish. If you dont like what's out there, dont complain about. Do something about it.
34
« on: August 08, 2010, 07:02:29 PM »
I think the members in question have been inactive for a week. So, it would be useful to know whether they have been banned or not.
Useful how? We know they are banned. Carbon has a whole thread about him. Taze has a thread somewhere with Carbon claiming to ban him. I dont see how a list of two people can be considered useful. PLus, it's been more than a week. Taze was banned in March.. Carbon was like 2 months ago. The damned thread just won't die. edit: it died Edite (By Declan_23): You're welcome.
35
« on: August 08, 2010, 06:35:46 PM »
Dont see much of a point in having one.
If a person hasnt logged on since June 2008, does it really matter if she or he is banned and/or inactive?
By them not being on for 2 years makes it safe to assume that they're inactive. Isnt that enough?
36
« on: August 07, 2010, 02:53:24 PM »
Question:
Would this thread even exist if you had gotten 10 subscribers?
37
« on: August 07, 2010, 02:42:22 PM »
Is there a planned date to release all of the names, abilities, and stats of the next Gen?
These leaks are quite unsatisfying.
As for most of them, Im hoping a few of these poke's arn't real. Just thrown in there to throw the Public off the trail of the real (slightly more awesome) pokemon.
38
« on: August 05, 2010, 06:19:57 PM »
My conclusion is that with 7 pokemons per "page", a scrollbar that is 7.6cm long and the scroll being 0.4cm, we'll have 133 new pokemons.
(7.6 / 0.4) * 7 = 133 exactly
Kamaran... Are you a mad scientist? If so, this ridonculous calculation definitely calls for the twirling of your curly moustache.
Agreed.
39
« on: August 05, 2010, 05:56:12 PM »
Im unsure to if having the pokemon following is a permanent feature. (Has yet to be confirmed by the PU team) The Screenshots are from pre-beta after all and the PU team have made an effort in making the game with "original everything" (concepts, tiles, sprites, stories, etc.) yet the sprites in the Screenshots are from HGSS.
I think that once the PU team gets more capable artists, following, walking with, and other extra doo-daads involving pokemon could actually be something to look forward to. Until then, I dont see that being a feature in the future versions.
edit: heck, if the PU team isnt able to acquire anymore capable artists, I dont see how there will ever be a finished version.
40
« on: August 05, 2010, 05:43:51 PM »
That means That the 1st Move tutor was in R/B/Y. TMs have been around since Day 1. So have Move Tutors.
This is true for 1 reason...
TMs and HMs are technically move Tutors.
Think of the move tutor as an actual NPC that does the teaching, not some purchaseable machine with magical powers.
41
« on: August 05, 2010, 05:23:27 PM »
So is it safe to assume that there will be 150+ new poke's in Gen V?
42
« on: August 04, 2010, 06:04:55 PM »
Another way to avoid abuse is to have players from the same IP range unable to join the same clan.
And , just because a player founds a clan doesnt necessarily make him/her a leader. Founding should limit the founder to "founding privilleges". And to avoid the 2-3 member spam clan, a clan must have at least 6 members in a week or face deletion. And after that week of existence, players should be given a ballot and vote for whomever they want to lead the clan.
Then, every other month or so, upon entering the "clan"/Guild house, players are automatically prompted into another vote for leadership in the clan.
Because one way to prevent corruption and mishandling of power is to limit the time one can actually be in power.
43
« on: August 04, 2010, 05:49:50 PM »
So long it's still in the subject, I think it's okay 
I think I'll add something else too, following my idea of making the ghosts available to a range of trainers instead of only the 'high ups'. What about... Making a team for each trainer level. And then, put restrictions.
Eg.
If you have trainer level 'X', then, you can only battle the ghost level 'X', no more, no less.
Of course, now, the level 'X' ghosts should be slightly better than the level 'X' trainer if EXP is involved so that abusing of the system is reduced.
Once an actual scale/formula has been made with player leveling, that sounds like a good idea, but it owuld be interesting to see who/what exactly the ghosts would be modeled after. Especially since it would be nearly impossible to ghost every player in PU. Because it's only training, and not training with an actual NPC or player, would it be weird to suggest that ghosts give a fraction of experience? That way, abuse would be almost entirely out of the question. About the cards.
5 (or more maybe) would be restricted number of cards you could have of totall strangers, wich you can give on.
But cards of your friends/buddies could be visable to you all the time, you wouldn't be able to trade them, just check out.
The cards should be sorted in categories like;
-Trainer cards (cards of fellow players, possible for trade)
-Friend cards (cards of those on your buddy list, not possible for trade)
-Leader cards (cards of gym leaders you have beaten, showing pokemon each of you have used, not up for trade)
-Elite cards (like cards of gym leaders, just that these would be from elite 4 and the champion)
-Brutal Cards (Cards of the brutal 5, extremely reare, same info as the leader and elite cards)
*When you would fight all of brutal 5, there would be like special qests avalible for you.
There should allso be ab option to lock your trainer cards for some people.
Example (made-up people):
PersonA is my hated rival. PersonB who is PersonA's friend has my card. PersonA will probably ask B for it, so he'll come up with tactics and a team, that could totally beat me. But I don't want it, so I lock my card from PersonA.
Still, there would be a problem, because PersonB could tell PersonA about my info.
I think info given on trainer cards should restricted.
There should be an option to update one's trainer card. And if that option is available, I dont see many people hiding too much information. Because if someone were to really have a hated (or friendly) rival, it would be tons more beneficial to interchange one's strongest poke's or real team with "dummy" poke's so a player wont be able to scalp or scout one's team during a tournament or friendly get together.
44
« on: August 04, 2010, 05:27:25 PM »
Sucks mi account couldnt be transferred over to the EU server. Not able to bring down the hammer with mi lvl 18 Chimchar and array of lvl 15 Nidorans (m&f's)
Now im stuck with a lvl 5 (or 6) piplup.
45
« on: August 04, 2010, 05:15:33 PM »
Came across a giant billboard on mi way home from mi friend's meth lab...
So yea, I didnt hear about it. I saw it. Floating in the sky that night.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 19
|
Show Posts
