* User Info

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Recent Posts

Anyone still around? by Bing
[October 28, 2024, 11:23:32 PM]


2023 Check in by Gawerty
[March 28, 2023, 12:41:12 AM]


Holy crap my login worked. by Ez
[December 03, 2020, 08:56:26 AM]


Been a while. by Bing
[July 13, 2019, 04:47:06 AM]


Was Feeling Nostalgic (Pokemon Knights) by Monzta
[October 24, 2018, 07:37:00 AM]


Old Habits Die Hard by Miss Wednesday
[January 23, 2018, 12:35:35 AM]


WHY IS EVERYONE MISSING by Tickles
[September 16, 2017, 08:20:25 PM]


Been a long time. by Monzta
[August 27, 2017, 03:18:58 PM]


Author Topic: [Discuss] Legendary Pokemon  (Read 11660 times)

Offline SnapDragon

  • Beginning Trainer
  • *
  • Posts: 11
  • Karma: -1
  • "You just lost."
    • View Profile
[Discuss] Legendary Pokemon
« on: January 06, 2010, 07:23:29 AM »
How many Legendary Pokemon have they made? Should they have stopped and do you think the pokemon series/games are better with all the new pokemon that are continuously coming out? Also, do you have any fan made pokemon I'm sure everyone would enjoy seeing each others creations and giving out pointers or advise.

Snap to it! X3
« Last Edit: January 06, 2010, 12:56:03 PM by Mr_Dark »
Blue tiger people + glowy magic stuff + fantastic animal + made up world= AVATAR!! XD yeah best movie every!

Offline Counter Bug

  • Beginning Trainer
  • *
  • Posts: 83
  • Karma: 3
  • online.gaming.expert
    • View Profile
Re: This is one that will gain many posts
« Reply #1 on: January 06, 2010, 11:31:34 AM »
Legendary pokemon should be able to be caught earlier. When I caught them, my party always was full =/
In my opinion, they really suck... I mean, they have high states and powerfull attacks, but thats all. In online gaming, they fail. The only useful legendary is Heatran because of its trait and Latios (without soul dew) because of the high special defense and recovery.
PTT-Converter is out!
   Download:  *klick*
   Mirror:  *klick*
I am making a bot for Pokemon Battle Arena xD

Offline Mr_Dark

  • PU God
  • Administrator
  • Senior Trainer
  • ********
  • Posts: 9.502
  • Karma: 52
  • QQ
    • View Profile
    • Dark Productions
Re: [Discuss] Legendary Pokemon
« Reply #2 on: January 06, 2010, 12:56:16 PM »
Changed the topic to: [Discuss] Legendary Pokemon
IRC: #pokemon-universe @ Rizon.net

!!PRIVATE MESSAGES WITHOUT A SUBJECT WILL NOT BE READ!!

Quote from: Frenchfry545
That settles it. I'm starting a new religion. It's called "Misterdarkism".

Offline ghostman50

  • Contributor
  • Normal Trainer
  • **
  • Posts: 284
  • Karma: 3
  • Blah Blah Blah.
    • View Profile
Re: [Discuss] Legendary Pokemon
« Reply #3 on: January 06, 2010, 04:14:00 PM »
Im unfamiliar with the newer legendary pokemon. but the originals, Articuno, Moltres, and Zapdos; are they still considered legendary?
Am I a ghost or a man? Or a man-ghost offspring that come from mi father's inexplicable penetration of mi mother's ghostly woman parts? Or am I a child imitating a man's ability to change into a ghostly form in order to preserve mi appellation?

"She's so sharp, depressed teenagers use her to cut themselves."  - Greg Gutfeld

Offline Jourdy288

  • New Trainer
  • Posts: 3
  • Karma: 0
  • I love fish!
    • View Profile
    • My Literary Blog
Re: [Discuss] Legendary Pokemon
« Reply #4 on: January 06, 2010, 09:04:39 PM »
Yes, they are still legendary, along with Lugia, Ho-oh, etc.

Offline Amphi

  • Pre-Beta Tester
  • Good Trainer
  • ***
  • Posts: 953
  • Karma: -2
  • Neko -----> <(^.^)>
    • View Profile
Re: [Discuss] Legendary Pokemon
« Reply #5 on: January 06, 2010, 09:50:21 PM »
I personally think that after The next Generation of Pokemon they should stop making the legendaries, really i mean you can already see that in the actually pokemon world the newer legendaries are way more powerful than the older ones, plus Dialga took Celebi's place as the time pokemon so dumb, Celebi is way cooler
Never Underestimate the Kindness of other Humans.

Offline Desbear

  • Soryboard Writer
  • PU Trial-Team
  • Elite Trainer
  • ****
  • Posts: 1.590
  • Karma: 3
  • TRANSMISSION_FOUND
    • View Profile
Re: [Discuss] Legendary Pokemon
« Reply #6 on: February 12, 2011, 11:09:37 PM »
i say go with new legendaries but do not repeat them oh and i say go go celebi
TRANSMISSION_END

Offline Mysterium

  • Beginning Trainer
  • *
  • Posts: 80
  • Karma: 0
    • View Profile
    • Mysty's Doodles.
Re: [Discuss] Legendary Pokemon
« Reply #7 on: February 19, 2011, 08:03:10 AM »
Honestly? They made WAY too many legendaries. They're nothing special anymore, because they're everywhere now. They needed to keep it down a bit, and not make 5 or 6 more every generation. ._.


Fly, my pretties! Fly! Fly!

Offline pokesmurf

  • Beginning Trainer
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Karma: 0
    • View Profile
Re: [Discuss] Legendary Pokemon
« Reply #8 on: February 19, 2011, 04:08:34 PM »
I like the legendaries, but if they want to put them in PU, I think it should be a lot harder to catch them. Otherwise everyone will be walking around with a couple of legendaries and that's just no fun.

Only legendary trainers should be able to catch legendary pokémon. By that I mean e.g. people who have completed a lot of very difficult quests or are in the top 50 ranking or so. And even then they should have only a slight change of seeing a legendary. Also people should be able to catch only one certain legendary, e.g. one Articuno.

Another possible idea is that there are for example 5 legendaries released every week and that you gotta be quite strong to catch one if you have the chance of seeing one.

Although I noticed while typing this that my text is slightly off-topic I wanted to share this crap with you... xD


Holding on to anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned.
~Buddha~

Offline Kamaran

  • Lead Mapper
  • PU Team
  • Good Trainer
  • *******
  • Posts: 965
  • Karma: 21
    • View Profile
Re: [Discuss] Legendary Pokemon
« Reply #9 on: February 19, 2011, 04:14:34 PM »
A lot of nonsense was right here.

Legendaries are not catchable.
"Don't touch the poster at the Game Corner! There's no secret switch behind it!"


Offline Desbear

  • Soryboard Writer
  • PU Trial-Team
  • Elite Trainer
  • ****
  • Posts: 1.590
  • Karma: 3
  • TRANSMISSION_FOUND
    • View Profile
Re: [Discuss] Legendary Pokemon
« Reply #10 on: February 19, 2011, 07:13:42 PM »
maybe not on pu but on the other games they are
TRANSMISSION_END

Offline Viper

  • Contributor
  • Good Trainer
  • ***
  • Posts: 515
  • Karma: 1
  • The One and Only
    • View Profile
Re: [Discuss] Legendary Pokemon
« Reply #11 on: February 19, 2011, 07:18:08 PM »
maybe not on pu but on the other games they are

Well pokesmurf wasnt talking about the other games, he was talking about PU.

Offline Frenchfry

  • Good Trainer
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.146
  • Karma: 0
  • I woke up with a clown's hand in my pants.
    • View Profile
Re: [Discuss] Legendary Pokemon
« Reply #12 on: February 19, 2011, 07:51:07 PM »
I actually didn't like the three birds all that much. Or Azelf, Mesprit, and Uxie.

Also, I find the combination of Mew, Groudon, Kyogre, Raquayza, Palkia, and Dialga to conflict severely with Arceus. Arceus created EVERYTHING, but the other guys all created something? Arceus is monotheistic, and everyone else combined is polytheistic. It's like if we just threw God into Greek Mythology. Seriously.






PS:
Mewtwo ftw.

Offline Desbear

  • Soryboard Writer
  • PU Trial-Team
  • Elite Trainer
  • ****
  • Posts: 1.590
  • Karma: 3
  • TRANSMISSION_FOUND
    • View Profile
Re: [Discuss] Legendary Pokemon
« Reply #13 on: February 19, 2011, 09:04:35 PM »
you are right french fry

ps.mew is better then mewtwo
TRANSMISSION_END

Offline Frenchfry

  • Good Trainer
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.146
  • Karma: 0
  • I woke up with a clown's hand in my pants.
    • View Profile
Re: [Discuss] Legendary Pokemon
« Reply #14 on: February 19, 2011, 10:22:11 PM »
Legendary Pokemon would be a ground and air war between Thor and God if it weren't for the Media Watchdog.