* User Info

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Recent Posts

2023 Check in by Gawerty
[March 28, 2023, 12:41:12 AM]


Holy crap my login worked. by Ez
[December 03, 2020, 08:56:26 AM]


Been a while. by Bing
[July 13, 2019, 04:47:06 AM]


Was Feeling Nostalgic (Pokemon Knights) by Monzta
[October 24, 2018, 07:37:00 AM]


Old Habits Die Hard by Miss Wednesday
[January 23, 2018, 12:35:35 AM]


WHY IS EVERYONE MISSING by Tickles
[September 16, 2017, 08:20:25 PM]


Been a long time. by Monzta
[August 27, 2017, 03:18:58 PM]


Pokemon Universe Tribute Thread by Jerry
[September 29, 2016, 06:41:31 PM]


Author Topic: so fire vs water starter  (Read 1622 times)

Offline cometlikesfire

  • New Trainer
  • Posts: 0
  • Karma: 0
    • View Profile
so fire vs water starter
« on: May 29, 2010, 11:37:39 PM »
Fire starters are literally the SLOWEST lvlers ive seen but have you ever EVER raised a Blazekien, frikin sweet but i have to admit it was a hastle, ( im lookin at rock gym, flying gym, psychic gym, water/ice gym ) mudkip was a useful little guy better after getting water gun not much problems with him ( fighting grass, ice, metal were big problems )

these are my opinions ( NOTE : I DO NOT USE MUDKIP EVER, IF I MISSED SOMETHING I APOLOGIZE )   :-\ im gonna go make my Blaziken lvl to 79

tell me what starter ( torchic or mudkip ) you like and why ( if you use treecko, i dont like your choice of starter, im sorry but that's how i role

Offline halospirit

  • New Trainer
  • Posts: 0
  • Karma: 0
    • View Profile
Re: so fire vs water starter
« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2010, 01:01:38 AM »
First i have to say i do like treeko... so now that thats out of the way I'd say I like mudkip better because that region was the only one I didnt think the fire starter was the best.